lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 1/2] devcoredump: remove the useless gfp_t parameter in dev_coredumpv and dev_coredumpm
Hello,

On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:21:36 -0700 Brian Norris wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 8:47 AM <duoming@zju.edu.cn> wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 16:58:01 +0200 Greg KH wrote:
> > > No, that is not necessary. Do the work now so that there is no flag day
> > > and you don't have to worry about new users, it will all "just work".
> >
> > Do you mean we should replace dev_set_name() in dev_coredumpm() to some other
> > functions that could work both in interrupt context and process context?
>
> No.
>
> I believe the suggestion is that rather than change the signature for
> dev_coredumpv() (which means everyone has to agree on the new
> signature on day 1), you should introduce a new API, like
> dev_coredumpv_noatomic() (I'm not good at naming [1]) with the
> signature you want, and then migrate users over. Once we have a
> release with no users of the old API, we drop it.
>
> There are plenty of examples of the kernel community doing similar
> transitions. You can search around for examples, but a quick search of
> my own shows something like this:
> https://lwn.net/Articles/735887/
> (In particular, timer_setup() was introduced, and all setup_timer()
> users were migrated to it within a release or two.)
>
> Brian
>
> [1] Seriously, dev_coredumpv_noatomic() is not a name I want to see
> last very long. Maybe some other trivial modification? Examples:
>
> dev_core_dumpv()
> dev_coredump_v()
> device_coredumpv()
> ...

Thank you very much for your timer and suggestions!

Best regards,
Duoming Zhou
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-23 16:20    [W:0.074 / U:0.408 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site