Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:11:06 +0200 | Subject | Re: regression bisect --> 88f1669019bd " scsi: sd: Rework asynchronous resume support" | From | Thorsten Leemhuis <> |
| |
Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker.
On 21.08.22 09:34, Mike Galbraith wrote: > Greetings, > > My box claims this patch is a dud for it, symptom being hang during > suspend _after_ a successful suspend/resume cycle. Revert at bisect > starting point and now HEAD (15b3f48a4339) confirms box's assertion. > [...] > # first bad commit: [88f1669019bd62b3009a3cebf772fbaaa21b9f38] scsi: sd: Rework asynchronous resume support
FYI, in case you missed it: there are multiple reports that this patch is causing problems. A revert and a partial reverts are discussed:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220816172638.538734-1-bvanassche@acm.org/ https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/dd6844e7-f338-a4e9-2dad-0960e25b2ca1@redhat.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/98592410-dd31-9081-86be-fda67d3b06d2@suse.cz/
See also: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ecf878dc-905b-f714-4c44-6c90e81f8391@acm.org/
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.
P.P.S.: Just to be sure, add this report to the regression tracking, too:
#regzbot ^introduced: 88f1669019bd62b3009a3 #regzbot dup-of: https://lore.kernel.org/all/98592410-dd31-9081-86be-fda67d3b06d2@suse.cz/ #regzbot monitor: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20220821220502.13685-1-bvanassche@acm.org/
| |