Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Kuniyuki Iwashima <> | Subject | [PATCH v1] seccomp: Release filter when copy_process() fails. | Date | Mon, 22 Aug 2022 13:44:36 -0700 |
| |
Our syzbot instance reported memory leaks in do_seccomp() [0], similar to the report [1]. It shows that we miss freeing struct seccomp_filter and some objects included in it.
We can reproduce the issue with the program below [2] which calls one seccomp() and two clone() syscalls.
The first clone()d child exits earlier than its parent and sends a signal to kill it during the second clone(), more precisely before the fatal_signal_pending() test in copy_process(). When the parent receives the signal, it has to destroy the embryonic process and return -EINTR to user space. In the failure path, we have to call seccomp_filter_release() to decrement the filter's ref count.
Initially, we called it in free_task() called from the failure path, but the commit 3a15fb6ed92c ("seccomp: release filter after task is fully dead") moved it to release_task() to notify user space as early as possible that the filter is no longer used.
To keep the change, let's call seccomp_filter_release() in copy_process() and add a WARN_ON_ONCE() in free_task() for future debugging.
[0]: unreferenced object 0xffff8880063add00 (size 256): comm "repro_seccomp", pid 230, jiffies 4294687090 (age 9.914s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................ backtrace: do_seccomp (./include/linux/slab.h:600 ./include/linux/slab.h:733 kernel/seccomp.c:666 kernel/seccomp.c:708 kernel/seccomp.c:1871 kernel/seccomp.c:1991) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120) unreferenced object 0xffffc90000035000 (size 4096): comm "repro_seccomp", pid 230, jiffies 4294687090 (age 9.915s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 05 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: __vmalloc_node_range (mm/vmalloc.c:3226) __vmalloc_node (mm/vmalloc.c:3261 (discriminator 4)) bpf_prog_alloc_no_stats (kernel/bpf/core.c:91) bpf_prog_alloc (kernel/bpf/core.c:129) bpf_prog_create_from_user (net/core/filter.c:1414) do_seccomp (kernel/seccomp.c:671 kernel/seccomp.c:708 kernel/seccomp.c:1871 kernel/seccomp.c:1991) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120) unreferenced object 0xffff888003fa1000 (size 1024): comm "repro_seccomp", pid 230, jiffies 4294687090 (age 9.915s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: bpf_prog_alloc_no_stats (./include/linux/slab.h:600 ./include/linux/slab.h:733 kernel/bpf/core.c:95) bpf_prog_alloc (kernel/bpf/core.c:129) bpf_prog_create_from_user (net/core/filter.c:1414) do_seccomp (kernel/seccomp.c:671 kernel/seccomp.c:708 kernel/seccomp.c:1871 kernel/seccomp.c:1991) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120) unreferenced object 0xffff888006360240 (size 16): comm "repro_seccomp", pid 230, jiffies 4294687090 (age 9.915s) hex dump (first 16 bytes): 01 00 37 00 76 65 72 6c e0 83 01 06 80 88 ff ff ..7.verl........ backtrace: bpf_prog_store_orig_filter (net/core/filter.c:1137) bpf_prog_create_from_user (net/core/filter.c:1428) do_seccomp (kernel/seccomp.c:671 kernel/seccomp.c:708 kernel/seccomp.c:1871 kernel/seccomp.c:1991) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120) unreferenced object 0xffff8880060183e0 (size 8): comm "repro_seccomp", pid 230, jiffies 4294687090 (age 9.915s) hex dump (first 8 bytes): 06 00 00 00 00 00 ff 7f ........ backtrace: kmemdup (mm/util.c:129) bpf_prog_store_orig_filter (net/core/filter.c:1144) bpf_prog_create_from_user (net/core/filter.c:1428) do_seccomp (kernel/seccomp.c:671 kernel/seccomp.c:708 kernel/seccomp.c:1871 kernel/seccomp.c:1991) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120)
[1]: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=2809bb0ac77ad9aa3f4afe42d6a610aba594a987
[2]: #define _GNU_SOURCE #include <sched.h> #include <signal.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/syscall.h> #include <linux/filter.h> #include <linux/seccomp.h>
void main(void) { struct sock_filter filter[] = { BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW), }; struct sock_fprog fprog = { .len = sizeof(filter) / sizeof(filter[0]), .filter = filter, }; long i, pid;
syscall(__NR_seccomp, SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, 0, &fprog);
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { pid = syscall(__NR_clone, CLONE_NEWNET | SIGKILL, NULL, NULL, 0); if (pid == 0) return; } }
Fixes: 3a15fb6ed92c ("seccomp: release filter after task is fully dead") Reported-by: syzbot+ab17848fe269b573eb71@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: Ayushman Dutta <ayudutta@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> --- kernel/fork.c | 2 ++ kernel/seccomp.c | 2 -- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c index 90c85b17bf69..031290fc527c 100644 --- a/kernel/fork.c +++ b/kernel/fork.c @@ -537,6 +537,7 @@ void put_task_stack(struct task_struct *tsk) void free_task(struct task_struct *tsk) { + WARN_ON_ONCE(tsk->seccomp.filter); release_user_cpus_ptr(tsk); scs_release(tsk); @@ -2498,6 +2499,7 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process( sched_core_free(p); spin_unlock(¤t->sighand->siglock); write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock); + seccomp_filter_release(p); cgroup_cancel_fork(p, args); bad_fork_put_pidfd: if (clone_flags & CLONE_PIDFD) { diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c index e9852d1b4a5e..017c1dd5b0d4 100644 --- a/kernel/seccomp.c +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c @@ -563,8 +563,6 @@ void seccomp_filter_release(struct task_struct *tsk) { struct seccomp_filter *orig = tsk->seccomp.filter; - /* We are effectively holding the siglock by not having any sighand. */ - WARN_ON(tsk->sighand != NULL); /* Detach task from its filter tree. */ tsk->seccomp.filter = NULL; -- 2.30.2
| |