lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subjectlinux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the bpf tree
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x

between commit:

27e23836ce22 ("selftests/bpf: Add lru_bug to s390x deny list")

from the bpf tree and commit:

b979f005d9b1 ("selftest/bpf: Add setget_sockopt to DENYLIST.s390x")

from the bpf-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x
index 5cadfbdadf36,a708c3dcc154..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x
@@@ -65,4 -65,4 +65,5 @@@ send_signa
select_reuseport # intermittently fails on new s390x setup
xdp_synproxy # JIT does not support calling kernel function (kfunc)
unpriv_bpf_disabled # fentry
+lru_bug # prog 'printk': failed to auto-attach: -524
+ setget_sockopt # attach unexpected error: -524 (trampoline)
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-22 03:03    [W:1.187 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site