lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next v1 07/10] net: dsa: microchip: warn about not supported synclko properties on KSZ9893 chips
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 03:03:43PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> KSZ9893 family of chips do not support synclko property. So warn about
> without preventing driver from start.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> index 71b5349d006a..d3a9836c706f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> @@ -1916,6 +1916,13 @@ int ksz_switch_register(struct ksz_device *dev)
> dev_err(dev->dev, "inconsistent synclko settings\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> +
> + if (dev->chip_id == KSZ9893_CHIP_ID && (dev->synclko_125 ||
> + dev->synclko_disable)) {
> + dev_warn(dev->dev, "microchip,synclko-125 and microchip,synclko-disable "
> + "properties are not supported on this chip. "
> + "Please fix you devicetree.\n");

s/you/your/

Does KSZ8 have a REFCLK output of any sort? If it doesn't, then
"microchip,synclko-disable" is kind of supported, right?

I wonder what there is to gain by saying that you should remove some
device tree properties from non-ksz9477. After all, anyone can add any
random properties to a KSZ8 switch OF node and you won't warn about
those.

> + }
> }
>
> ret = dsa_register_switch(dev->ds);
> --
> 2.30.2
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-02 13:37    [W:0.266 / U:0.616 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site