Messages in this thread | | | From | Dmitry Rokosov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1] regmap: introduce value tracing for regmap bulk operations | Date | Fri, 19 Aug 2022 15:22:14 +0000 |
| |
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 03:44:19PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > I didn't realise that was even a question, but then there seems to be > > > some discussion I've not seen given the CCing going on. The biggest > > > issue is do we even want the overhead but I'll need to find time to look > > > at this properly. > > > No any additional discussion before. I've added your address to all emails > > which I sent. > > I assume you copied in Thomas, Rasmus and Marc for some reason?
No reason, sorry for make misunderstanding here. I have listed other regmap discussions and added them to get more opinions.
> > > Why do you think it this patch will bring overhead to regmap? AFAK, when > > tracepoint is disabled, tracepoint fast assign operation shouldn't be > > executed. In other words, memcpy will not be applied. > > To repeat I have not yet looked at your patch properly, one concern is > how we handle the marshalling which regmap does.
Okay, no problem
-- Thank you, Dmitry
| |