Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 19 Aug 2022 15:44:19 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1] regmap: introduce value tracing for regmap bulk operations |
| |
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 01:31:35PM +0000, Dmitry Rokosov wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 01:07:47PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I didn't realise that was even a question, but then there seems to be > > some discussion I've not seen given the CCing going on. The biggest > > issue is do we even want the overhead but I'll need to find time to look > > at this properly.
> No any additional discussion before. I've added your address to all emails > which I sent.
I assume you copied in Thomas, Rasmus and Marc for some reason?
> Why do you think it this patch will bring overhead to regmap? AFAK, when > tracepoint is disabled, tracepoint fast assign operation shouldn't be > executed. In other words, memcpy will not be applied.
To repeat I have not yet looked at your patch properly, one concern is how we handle the marshalling which regmap does. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |