lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1] regmap: introduce value tracing for regmap bulk operations
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 01:31:35PM +0000, Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 01:07:47PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I didn't realise that was even a question, but then there seems to be
> > some discussion I've not seen given the CCing going on. The biggest
> > issue is do we even want the overhead but I'll need to find time to look
> > at this properly.

> No any additional discussion before. I've added your address to all emails
> which I sent.

I assume you copied in Thomas, Rasmus and Marc for some reason?

> Why do you think it this patch will bring overhead to regmap? AFAK, when
> tracepoint is disabled, tracepoint fast assign operation shouldn't be
> executed. In other words, memcpy will not be applied.

To repeat I have not yet looked at your patch properly, one concern is
how we handle the marshalling which regmap does.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-19 16:44    [W:0.081 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site