lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bings: net: fsl,fec: update compatible item
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:51:02AM +0300, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18/08/2022 04:33, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 11:12:09AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,fec.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,fec.yaml
> >>> index daa2f79a294f..6642c246951b 100644
> >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,fec.yaml
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,fec.yaml
> >>> @@ -40,6 +40,10 @@ properties:
> >>> - enum:
> >>> - fsl,imx7d-fec
> >>> - const: fsl,imx6sx-fec
> >>> + - items:
> >>> + - enum:
> >>> + - fsl,imx8ulp-fec
> >>> + - const: fsl,imx6ul-fec
> >>
> >> This is wrong. fsl,imx6ul-fec has to be followed by fsl,imx6q-fec. I
> >> think someone made similar mistakes earlier so this is a mess.
> >
> > Hmm, not sure I follow this. Supposing we want to have the following
> > compatible for i.MX8ULP FEC, why do we have to have "fsl,imx6q-fec"
> > here?
> >
> > fec: ethernet@29950000 {
> > compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-fec", "fsl,imx6ul-fec";
> > ...
> > };
>
> Because a bit earlier this bindings is saying that fsl,imx6ul-fec must
> be followed by fsl,imx6q-fec.

The FEC driver OF match table suggests that fsl,imx6ul-fec and fsl,imx6q-fec
are not really compatible.

static const struct of_device_id fec_dt_ids[] = {
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx25-fec", .data = &fec_devtype[IMX25_FEC], },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx27-fec", .data = &fec_devtype[IMX27_FEC], },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx28-fec", .data = &fec_devtype[IMX28_FEC], },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx6q-fec", .data = &fec_devtype[IMX6Q_FEC], },
{ .compatible = "fsl,mvf600-fec", .data = &fec_devtype[MVF600_FEC], },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-fec", .data = &fec_devtype[IMX6SX_FEC], },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx6ul-fec", .data = &fec_devtype[IMX6UL_FEC], },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8mq-fec", .data = &fec_devtype[IMX8MQ_FEC], },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8qm-fec", .data = &fec_devtype[IMX8QM_FEC], },
{ /* sentinel */ }
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, fec_dt_ids);

Should we fix the binding doc?

Shawn

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-18 11:25    [W:0.121 / U:0.240 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site