lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/4] bpf: Add support for writing to nf_conn:mark
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:48:31PM +0200, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 at 20:43, Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz> wrote:
[...]
> > diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h
> > index a473b56842c5..0f584c2bd475 100644
> > --- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h
> > +++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h
> > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> > #ifndef _NF_CONNTRACK_BPF_H
> > #define _NF_CONNTRACK_BPF_H
> >
> > +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> > #include <linux/btf.h>
> > #include <linux/kconfig.h>
> >
> > @@ -10,6 +11,12 @@
> > (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES))
> >
> > extern int register_nf_conntrack_bpf(void);
> > +extern int nf_conntrack_btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
> > + const struct btf *btf,
> > + const struct btf_type *t, int off,
> > + int size, enum bpf_access_type atype,
> > + u32 *next_btf_id,
> > + enum bpf_type_flag *flag);
> >
> > #else
> >
> > @@ -18,6 +25,17 @@ static inline int register_nf_conntrack_bpf(void)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline int
> > +nf_conntrack_btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
> > + const struct btf *btf,
> > + const struct btf_type *t, int off,
> > + int size, enum bpf_access_type atype,
> > + u32 *next_btf_id,
> > + enum bpf_type_flag *flag)
> > +{
> > + return -EACCES;
> > +}
> > +
>
> We should make it work when nf_conntrack is a kernel module as well,
> not just when it is compiled in. The rest of the stuff already works
> when it is a module. For that, you can have a global function pointer
> for this callback, protected by a mutex. register/unregister sets
> it/unsets it. Each time you call it requires mutex to be held during
> the call.
>
> Later when we have more modules that supply btf_struct_access callback
> for their module types we can generalize it, for now it should be ok
> to hardcode it for nf_conn.

Ok, will look into that.

>
> > #endif
> >
> > #endif /* _NF_CONNTRACK_BPF_H */
[...]
> >
> > +/* Check writes into `struct nf_conn` */
> > +int nf_conntrack_btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
> > + const struct btf *btf,
> > + const struct btf_type *t, int off,
> > + int size, enum bpf_access_type atype,
> > + u32 *next_btf_id,
> > + enum bpf_type_flag *flag)
> > +{
> > + const struct btf_type *nct = READ_ONCE(nf_conn_type);
> > + s32 type_id;
> > + size_t end;
> > +
> > + if (!nct) {
> > + type_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf, "nf_conn", BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
> > + if (type_id < 0)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + nct = btf_type_by_id(btf, type_id);
> > + WRITE_ONCE(nf_conn_type, nct);
>
> Instead of this, why not just use BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE to get the
> type_id and then match 't' to the result of btf_type_by_id?
> btf_type_by_id is not expensive.

Ah yeah, good idea. Will fix.

[...]

Thanks,
Daniel

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-18 21:33    [W:0.212 / U:2.736 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site