lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v6 1/2] mm: migration: fix the FOLL_GET failure on following huge page
Date
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2022 13:43
> To: Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; david@redhat.com; apopple@nvidia.com;
> linmiaohe@huawei.com; Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>; songmuchun@bytedance.com;
> naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev; alex.sierra@amd.com; Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>; Vasily Gorbik
> <gor@linux.ibm.com>; Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>; Christian Borntraeger
> <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>; Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>; Mike Kravetz
> <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] mm: migration: fix the FOLL_GET failure on following huge page
>
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 03:31:37 +0000 "Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > > > }
> > >
> > > I would be better to fix this for real at those three client code sites?
> >
> > Then 5.19 will break for a while to wait for the final BIG patch ?
>
> If that's the proposal then your [1/2] should have had a cc:stable and
> changelog words describing the plan for 6.0.
>
> But before we do that I'd like to see at least a prototype of the final
> fixes to s390 and hugetlb, so we can assess those as preferable for

Got it, make sense. ;-)

> backporting. I don't think they'll be terribly intrusive or risky?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-17 07:51    [W:0.128 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site