lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Update bindings for J7200 CPSW5G
From
Hello Krzysztof,

On 17/08/22 11:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/08/2022 08:14, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>
>>>> - port@[1-2]:
>>>> + "^port@[1-4]$":
>>>> type: object
>>>> description: CPSWxG NUSS external ports
>>>>
>>>> @@ -119,7 +120,7 @@ properties:
>>>> properties:
>>>> reg:
>>>> minimum: 1
>>>> - maximum: 2
>>>> + maximum: 4
>>>> description: CPSW port number
>>>>
>>>> phys:
>>>> @@ -151,6 +152,18 @@ properties:
>>>>
>>>> additionalProperties: false
>>>>
>>>> +if:
>>>
>>> This goes under allOf just before unevaluated/additionalProperties:false
>>
>> allOf was added by me in v3 series patch and it is not present in the
>> file. I removed it in v4 after Rob Herring's suggestion. Please let me
>> know if simply moving the if-then statements to the line above
>> additionalProperties:false would be fine.
>
> I think Rob's comment was focusing not on using or not-using allOf, but
> on format of your entire if-then-else. Your v3 was huge and included
> allOf in wrong place).
>
> Now you add if-then in proper place, but it is still advisable to put it
> with allOf, so if ever you grow the if-then by new entry, you do not
> have to change the indentation.
>
> Anyway the location is not correct. Regardless if this is if-then or
> allOf-if-then, put it just like example schema is suggesting.

I will move the if-then statements to the lines above the
"additionalProperties: false" line. Also, I will add an allOf for this
single if-then statement in the v5 series.

Regards,
Siddharth.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-17 09:45    [W:0.058 / U:0.480 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site