lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 5.18 0000/1095] 5.18.18-rc1 review
    On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 at 00:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman
    <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
    >
    > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.18 release.
    > There are 1095 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
    > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
    > let me know.
    >
    > Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Aug 2022 18:01:29 +0000.
    > Anything received after that time might be too late.
    >
    > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
    > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.18-rc1.gz
    > or in the git tree and branch at:
    > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
    > and the diffstat can be found below.
    >
    > thanks,
    >
    > greg k-h

    Results from Linaro's test farm.
    No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

    Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

    ## Build
    * kernel: 5.18.18-rc1
    * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
    * git branch: linux-5.18.y
    * git commit: 56bd9e4c28e9ed65e07e7148e65adfdf1f1c5524
    * git describe: v5.18.17-1096-g56bd9e4c28e9
    * test details:
    https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.18.y/build/v5.18.17-1096-g56bd9e4c28e9

    ## No test Regressions (compared to v5.18.16-36-g732bf05a92ab)

    ## No metric Regressions (compared to v5.18.16-36-g732bf05a92ab)

    ## No test Fixes (compared to v5.18.16-36-g732bf05a92ab)

    ## No metric Fixes (compared to v5.18.16-36-g732bf05a92ab)

    ## Test result summary
    total: 93607, pass: 85358, fail: 732, skip: 6930, xfail: 587

    ## Build Summary
    * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
    * arm: 301 total, 301 passed, 0 failed
    * arm64: 62 total, 60 passed, 2 failed
    * i386: 52 total, 50 passed, 2 failed
    * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed
    * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
    * powerpc: 60 total, 54 passed, 6 failed
    * riscv: 27 total, 22 passed, 5 failed
    * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
    * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
    * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
    * x86_64: 55 total, 53 passed, 2 failed

    ## Test suites summary
    * fwts
    * kunit
    * kvm-unit-tests
    * libgpiod
    * libhugetlbfs
    * log-parser-boot
    * log-parser-test
    * ltp-cap_bounds
    * ltp-commands
    * ltp-containers
    * ltp-controllers
    * ltp-cpuhotplug
    * ltp-crypto
    * ltp-cve
    * ltp-dio
    * ltp-fcntl-locktests
    * ltp-filecaps
    * ltp-fs
    * ltp-fs_bind
    * ltp-fs_perms_simple
    * ltp-fsx
    * ltp-hugetlb
    * ltp-io
    * ltp-ipc
    * ltp-math
    * ltp-mm
    * ltp-nptl
    * ltp-open-posix-tests
    * ltp-pty
    * ltp-sched
    * ltp-securebits
    * ltp-smoke
    * ltp-syscalls
    * ltp-tracing
    * network-basic-tests
    * packetdrill
    * rcutorture
    * ssuite
    * v4l2-compliance
    * vdso

    --
    Linaro LKFT
    https://lkft.linaro.org

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2022-08-16 11:55    [W:6.072 / U:0.052 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site