Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Aug 2022 10:59:29 +0300 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: edac: Add bindings for Xilinx ZynqMP OCM | From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <> |
| |
On 16/08/2022 10:32, Sai Krishna Potthuri wrote: > From: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@xilinx.com> > > Add bindings for Xilinx ZynqMP OCM controller. > > Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@xilinx.com> > Signed-off-by: Sai Krishna Potthuri <sai.krishna.potthuri@amd.com> > --- > .../bindings/edac/xlnx,zynqmp-ocmc.yaml | 41 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/xlnx,zynqmp-ocmc.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/xlnx,zynqmp-ocmc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/xlnx,zynqmp-ocmc.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..9bcecaccade2 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/xlnx,zynqmp-ocmc.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/edac/xlnx,zynqmp-ocmc.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: Xilinx Zynqmp OCM EDAC driver
s/EDAC driver// Is it a memory controller?
> + > +maintainers: > + - Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@amd.com> > + - Sai Krishna Potthuri <sai.krishna.potthuri@amd.com> > + > +description: | > + Xilinx ZynqMP OCM EDAC driver, it does reports the OCM ECC single bit errors
The same. Describe the hardware, not the Linux driver or its subsystem.
> + that are corrected and double bit ecc errors that are detected by the OCM
s/ecc/ECC/
> + ECC controller. > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + const: xlnx,zynqmp-ocmc-1.0 > + > + reg: > + maxItems: 1 > + > + interrupts: > + maxItems: 1 > + > +required: > + - compatible > + - reg > + - interrupts > + > +unevaluatedProperties: false > + > +examples: > + - | > + memory-controller@ff960000 { > + compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-ocmc-1.0"; > + reg = <0xff960000 0x1000>; > + interrupts = <0 10 4>;
Isn't the interrupt using common flags? If so, use proper defines.
> + };
Best regards, Krzysztof
| |