lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86/microcode/AMD: Attempt applying on every logical thread
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 02:41:39PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 09:00:14AM +0000, Ashok Raj wrote:
> > A re-application means, you want to apply even if the cpu_rev <= patch.rev
>
> Yes.

I see, so we probably shouldn't remove the rev check completely but just
permit to reload if the rev is equal?

>
> > if cpu_rev is > patch_rev, clearly its ahead?. say BIOS has a newer
> > version than in the initrd image, do we want to replace the BIOS
> > version since we do no revid checks here.
>
> Can you even downgrade the microcode through the MSR?

I'm not sure what is true for AMD.

For Intel's there is a Security Version Number in the signed encrypted part
of the microcode. As long as the new image has SVN >= what the CPU's SVN is
you can update the microcode.

So if a rev2 is loaded, and rev1 is the new MCU, and rev2 and rev1 have the
same SVN, you can go down rev from rev2->rev1 where rev2 > rev1.

Microcode enforcement for rollback protection has been the SVN. Version
number is a SW feel good thing to identifying which image you are running,
not intended for preventing rollback or any security enforcement.

Cheers,
Ashok

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-16 18:52    [W:0.081 / U:0.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site