Messages in this thread | | | From | Peng Fan <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH V2 2/8] clk: imx93: guard imx93_clk_of_match with CONFIG_OF | Date | Mon, 15 Aug 2022 08:19:52 +0000 |
| |
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/8] clk: imx93: guard imx93_clk_of_match with > CONFIG_OF > > On 22-08-15 09:30:33, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> > > > > There is build warning when CONFIG_OF is not selected. > > >> drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c:324:34: warning: 'imx93_clk_of_match' > > >> defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] > > 324 | static const struct of_device_id imx93_clk_of_match[] = { > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > Use CONFIG_OF to guard imx93_clk_of_match to avoid build warning. > > > > Fixes: 24defbe194b6 ("clk: imx: add i.MX93 clk") > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> > > --- > > drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c > > index f5c9fa40491c..5099048b7916 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c > > @@ -321,11 +321,13 @@ static int imx93_clocks_probe(struct > platform_device *pdev) > > return ret; > > } > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > > Hmm, I'm not sure if we should do this or rather should we make this driver > depend somehow on CONFIG_OF in Kconfig. > > Looking at the other i.MX clock drivers, it would seem we need this for all > them too.
No. It is i.MX93 use of_match_ptr, I could drop it as i.MX8M.
Thanks, Peng.
> > I fairly OK with this, but maybe Stephen suggests something different. > > Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com> > > > static const struct of_device_id imx93_clk_of_match[] = { > > { .compatible = "fsl,imx93-ccm" }, > > { /* Sentinel */ }, > > }; > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx93_clk_of_match); > > +#endif > > > > static struct platform_driver imx93_clk_driver = { > > .probe = imx93_clocks_probe, > > -- > > 2.37.1 > >
| |