lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] perf/arm_pmu_platform: Fix an error message related to dev_err_probe() usage
From
Le 08/08/2022 à 16:57, Robin Murphy a écrit :
> On 2022-08-05 21:55, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> dev_err() is a macro that expand dev_fmt, but dev_err_probe() is a
>> function and cannot perform this macro expansion.
>>
>> So hard code the "hw perfevents: " prefix and dd a comment explaining
>> why.
>>
>> Fixes: 11fa1dc8020a ("perf/arm_pmu_platform: Use dev_err_probe() for
>> IRQ errors")
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
>> ---
>> Untested, but I can't see how it could work.
>>
>> v1 --> v2
>>    - fix a typo in the comment
>> ---
>>   drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c | 7 +++++--
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
>> b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
>> index 513de1f54e2d..02cca4b8f0fd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
>> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
>> @@ -101,8 +101,11 @@ static int pmu_parse_irqs(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
>>       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>       num_irqs = platform_irq_count(pdev);
>> -    if (num_irqs < 0)
>> -        return dev_err_probe(dev, num_irqs, "unable to count PMU
>> IRQs\n");
>> +    if (num_irqs < 0) {
>> +        /* dev_err_probe() does not handle dev_fmt, so hard-code the
>> prefix */
>> +        return dev_err_probe(dev, num_irqs,
>> +                     "hw perfevents: unable to count PMU IRQs\n");
>
> Why not use dev_fmt directly? But even better, is there any practical
> reason why this couldn't be fixed at the source by indirecting
> dev_err_probe() through a macro wrapper just like all its friends:
>
> #define dev_err_probe(dev, err, fmt, ...) \
>     _dev_err_probe(dev, err, dev_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
>
> ?

Looks nice.

I'll propose it in a week or so, unless s.o. does it in the mean-time.

CJ

>
> Thanks,
> Robin.
>
>> +    }
>>       /*
>>        * In this case we have no idea which CPUs are covered by the PMU.
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-10 22:02    [W:0.041 / U:0.704 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site