Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] lib/test_cpumask: drop cpu_possible_mask full test | From | Sander Vanheule <> | Date | Wed, 10 Aug 2022 10:18:55 +0200 |
| |
Hi Maíra,
On Tue, 2022-08-09 at 19:26 -0300, Maíra Canal wrote: > On 8/9/22 15:08, Sander Vanheule wrote: > > cpu_possible_mask is not necessarily completely filled. That means > > running a check on cpumask_full() doesn't make sense, so drop the test. > > > > Fixes: c41e8866c28c ("lib/test: introduce cpumask KUnit test suite") > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/346cb279-8e75-24b0-7d12-9803f2b41c73@riseup.net/ > > Reported-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net> > > Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net> > > Tested-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
Thanks for testing again, and sorry for the trouble!
Best, Sander
> > > Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> > > --- > > lib/test_cpumask.c | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/lib/test_cpumask.c b/lib/test_cpumask.c > > index a31a1622f1f6..4ebf9f5805f3 100644 > > --- a/lib/test_cpumask.c > > +++ b/lib/test_cpumask.c > > @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ static cpumask_t mask_all; > > static void test_cpumask_weight(struct kunit *test) > > { > > KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_empty(&mask_empty)); > > - KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(cpu_possible_mask)); > > KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(&mask_all)); > > > > KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_weight(&mask_empty));
| |