lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 5.18 06/88] userfaultfd: provide properly masked address for huge-pages
Date
From: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>

commit d172b1a3bd065dd89234eac547fc62cf80681631 upstream.

Commit 824ddc601adc ("userfaultfd: provide unmasked address on
page-fault") was introduced to fix an old bug, in which the offset in the
address of a page-fault was masked. Concerns were raised - although were
never backed by actual code - that some userspace code might break because
the bug has been around for quite a while. To address these concerns a
new flag was introduced, and only when this flag is set by the user,
userfaultfd provides the exact address of the page-fault.

The commit however had a bug, and if the flag is unset, the offset was
always masked based on a base-page granularity. Yet, for huge-pages, the
behavior prior to the commit was that the address is masked to the
huge-page granulrity.

While there are no reports on real breakage, fix this issue. If the flag
is unset, use the address with the masking that was done before.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220711165906.2682-1-namit@vmware.com
Fixes: 824ddc601adc ("userfaultfd: provide unmasked address on page-fault")
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Reported-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/userfaultfd.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -191,17 +191,19 @@ static inline void msg_init(struct uffd_
}

static inline struct uffd_msg userfault_msg(unsigned long address,
+ unsigned long real_address,
unsigned int flags,
unsigned long reason,
unsigned int features)
{
struct uffd_msg msg;
+
msg_init(&msg);
msg.event = UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT;

- if (!(features & UFFD_FEATURE_EXACT_ADDRESS))
- address &= PAGE_MASK;
- msg.arg.pagefault.address = address;
+ msg.arg.pagefault.address = (features & UFFD_FEATURE_EXACT_ADDRESS) ?
+ real_address : address;
+
/*
* These flags indicate why the userfault occurred:
* - UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WP indicates a write protect fault.
@@ -485,8 +487,8 @@ vm_fault_t handle_userfault(struct vm_fa

init_waitqueue_func_entry(&uwq.wq, userfaultfd_wake_function);
uwq.wq.private = current;
- uwq.msg = userfault_msg(vmf->real_address, vmf->flags, reason,
- ctx->features);
+ uwq.msg = userfault_msg(vmf->address, vmf->real_address, vmf->flags,
+ reason, ctx->features);
uwq.ctx = ctx;
uwq.waken = false;


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-01 14:13    [W:0.265 / U:2.632 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site