Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Date | Thu, 7 Jul 2022 15:37:40 +0200 | Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH v4] MAINTAINERS: add polarfire rng, pci and clock drivers |
| |
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 3:30 PM <Conor.Dooley@microchip.com> wrote: > > On 22/06/2022 23:58, Conor Dooley wrote: > > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > > > > Hardware random, PCI and clock drivers for the PolarFire SoC have been > > upstreamed but are not covered by the MAINTAINERS entry, so add them. > > Daire is the author of the clock & PCI drivers, so add him as a > > maintainer in place of Lewis. > > > > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > > Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > > Arnd, Palmer: > Does the SoC tree make more sense for this patch? > I am missing an ack from Herbert (but I don't think that's blocking > for a MAINTAINERS update to my own entry?). > > If SoC is the better option, should I resend this to soc@kernel.org? > Unfortunately, since I originally sent this patch there have been > other changes to this entry that will conflict in -next (all are > additions so easily resolved...). > > I was hoping to get this patch applied to v5.19-rc(foo) since we > never added maintainers entries for these drivers rather than wait > for v5.20. > > If you (plural) would rather wait for v5.20, I can resubmit this patch > after v5.20-mw1 with an additional i2c entry (if the driver is applied) > that already has an ack from Wolfram.
I tend to take MAINTAINERS updates as bugfixes in the soc tre (for 5.19), and I can pick it up if you send it to soc@kernel.org.
There should never be a need to wait for the merge window with these updates, it's either a bugfix (for 5.19) or for the current -next cycle (5.20).
Arnd
| |