lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v10 2/2] misc: Add a mechanism to detect stalls on guest vCPUs
Hi Sebastian,

On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 03:42:27PM +0000, Sebastian Ene wrote:
> This driver creates per-cpu hrtimers which are required to do the
> periodic 'pet' operation. On a conventional watchdog-core driver, the
> userspace is responsible for delivering the 'pet' events by writing to
> the particular /dev/watchdogN node. In this case we require a strong
> thread affinity to be able to account for lost time on a per vCPU.
>
> This part of the driver is the 'frontend' which is reponsible for
> delivering the periodic 'pet' events, configuring the virtual peripheral
> and listening for cpu hotplug events. The other part of the driver is
> an emulated MMIO device which is part of the KVM virtual machine
> monitor and this part accounts for lost time by looking at the
> /proc/{}/task/{}/stat entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/misc/Kconfig | 14 ++
> drivers/misc/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/misc/vcpu_stall_detector.c | 209 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 224 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/vcpu_stall_detector.c

Thanks for addressing all of my feedback on v9 so promptly:

Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Just one question on this part:

> +static enum hrtimer_restart
> +vcpu_stall_detect_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
> +{
> + u32 ticks, ping_timeout_ms;
> +
> + /* Reload the stall detector counter register every
> + * `ping_timeout_ms` to prevent the virtual device
> + * from decrementing it to 0. The virtual device decrements this
> + * register at 'clock_freq_hz' frequency.
> + */
> + ticks = vcpu_stall_config.clock_freq_hz *
> + vcpu_stall_config.stall_timeout_sec;

It would be quite easy for this to overflow 32 bits, so perhaps it would
be best to check the values from the DT during probe and fallback to the
defaults (with a warning) if the result of the multiplication is out
of range for the 32-bit register.

What do you think? My review stands in any case, as this shouldn't happen
in practice with sensible values.

Will

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-07 20:29    [W:0.125 / U:0.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site