Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 7 Jul 2022 11:18:41 -0700 | Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH 3/8] hwrng: bcm2835: bcmbca: Replace ARCH_BCM_63XX with ARCH_BCMBCA | From | William Zhang <> |
| |
On 7/7/22 10:16, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote: > On 07/07/2022 18:05, William Zhang wrote: >> On 7/7/22 09:23, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>> On 7/6/22 23:57, William Zhang wrote: >>>> Prepare for the BCM63138 ARCH_BCM_63XX migration to ARCH_BCMBCA. Make >>>> HW_RANDOM_BCM2835 depending on ARCH_BCMBCA. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: William Zhang <william.zhang@broadcom.com> >>> >>> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> >>> >>> There is no cover letter for this 8 patch series :/ it is not clear to me whether each subsystem maintainer will be in a posotion to merge these patches individually, yet still have all 8 (7 of them actually, see comment to patch 1) land in 5.20. >>> >> The cover letter will gather all the recipients which will be more than 50 > > tbf, you probably could cut down the CC list if you want, it isnt required > to CC absolutely everyone that gets spat out by get_maintainer. > > For example, I am CCed because I was a recent author for the hwrng kconfig > file, so people like me could be safely excluded if you need to cut down on > the number of people that you are CCing. > > Not that I have a problem with being CCed, just if it helps you hit a min. > threshold feel free to drop me :) Thanks! That is my plan too. Try to figure out the threshold now lol [unhandled content-type:application/pkcs7-signature]
| |