Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 6 Jul 2022 20:53:33 +0530 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] cpufreq: Panic if policy is active in cpufreq_policy_free() |
| |
On 06-07-22, 15:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > WARN_ON() would be somewhat better, but then I'm not sure if having a > full call trace in this case is really useful, because we know when > cpufreq_policy_free() can be called anyway. > > Maybe just print a warning message.
The warning will get printed, yes, but I am sure everyone will end up ignoring it, once it happens.
One of the benefits of printing the call-stack is people will take it seriously and report it, and we won't miss a bug, if one gets in somehow.
-- viresh
| |