lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] hwspinlock: qcom: Add support for mmio usage to sfpb-mutex
On Wed 06 Jul 20:30 CDT 2022, Christian Marangi wrote:

> Allow sfpb-mutex to use mmio in addition to syscon.
>

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> index 364710966665..23c913095bd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
> #define QCOM_MUTEX_APPS_PROC_ID 1
> #define QCOM_MUTEX_NUM_LOCKS 32
>
> +struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data {
> + u32 offset;
> + u32 stride;
> +};
> +
> static int qcom_hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
> {
> struct regmap_field *field = lock->priv;
> @@ -63,9 +68,20 @@ static const struct hwspinlock_ops qcom_hwspinlock_ops = {
> .unlock = qcom_hwspinlock_unlock,
> };
>
> +static const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data of_sfpb_mutex = {
> + .offset = 0x4,
> + .stride = 0x4,
> +};
> +
> +/* All modern platform has offset 0 and stride of 4k */
> +static const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data of_tcsr_mutex = {
> + .offset = 0,
> + .stride = 0x1000,
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id qcom_hwspinlock_of_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "qcom,sfpb-mutex" },
> - { .compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex" },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,sfpb-mutex", .data = &of_sfpb_mutex },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex", .data = &of_tcsr_mutex },
> { }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_hwspinlock_of_match);
> @@ -101,7 +117,7 @@ static struct regmap *qcom_hwspinlock_probe_syscon(struct platform_device *pdev,
> return regmap;
> }
>
> -static const struct regmap_config tcsr_mutex_config = {
> +static const struct regmap_config qcom_hwspinlock_mmio_config = {

Any objections against me skipping this rename when applying the patch?
Just to keep the patch to the point?

Regards,
Bjorn

> .reg_bits = 32,
> .reg_stride = 4,
> .val_bits = 32,
> @@ -112,18 +128,20 @@ static const struct regmap_config tcsr_mutex_config = {
> static struct regmap *qcom_hwspinlock_probe_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev,
> u32 *offset, u32 *stride)
> {
> + const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data *data;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> void __iomem *base;
>
> - /* All modern platform has offset 0 and stride of 4k */
> - *offset = 0;
> - *stride = 0x1000;
> + data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +
> + *offset = data->offset;
> + *stride = data->stride;
>
> base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(base))
> return ERR_CAST(base);
>
> - return devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &tcsr_mutex_config);
> + return devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &qcom_hwspinlock_mmio_config);
> }
>
> static int qcom_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> --
> 2.36.1
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-07 04:55    [W:0.112 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site