lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v2 4/4] cpufreq: Change order of online() CB and policy->cpus modification
Date
From a state where all policy->related_cpus are offline, putting one
of the policy's CPU back online re-activates the policy by:
1. Calling cpufreq_driver->online()
2. Setting the CPU in policy->cpus

qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_online() makes use of policy->cpus. Thus 1. and 2.
should be inverted to avoid having a policy->cpus empty. The
qcom-cpufreq-hw is the only driver affected by this.

Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 2cad42774164..36043be16d8e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1350,15 +1350,15 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
}

if (!new_policy && cpufreq_driver->online) {
+ /* Recover policy->cpus using related_cpus */
+ cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, policy->related_cpus);
+
ret = cpufreq_driver->online(policy);
if (ret) {
pr_debug("%s: %d: initialization failed\n", __func__,
__LINE__);
goto out_exit_policy;
}
-
- /* Recover policy->cpus using related_cpus */
- cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, policy->related_cpus);
} else {
cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpumask_of(cpu));

--
2.25.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-04 13:29    [W:0.039 / U:0.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site