lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/6] can: sja1000: Add support for RZ/N1 SJA1000 CAN Controller
On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 07:15:16AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> Hi Marc and Uwe,
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] can: sja1000: Add support for RZ/N1 SJA1000 CAN
> > Controller
> >
> > On 02.07.2022 15:01:30, Biju Das wrote:
> > > The SJA1000 CAN controller on RZ/N1 SoC has some differences compared
> > > to others like it has no clock divider register (CDR) support and it
> > > has no HW loopback(HW doesn't see tx messages on rx).
> > >
> > > This patch adds support for RZ/N1 SJA1000 CAN Controller.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_platform.c | 34
> > > ++++++++++++++++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_platform.c
> > > b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_platform.c
> > > index 5f3d362e0da5..8e63af76a013 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_platform.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_platform.c
> > [...]
> > > @@ -262,6 +276,16 @@ static int sp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > priv->reg_base = addr;
> > >
> > > if (of) {
> > > + clk = devm_clk_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "can_clk");
> > > + if (IS_ERR(clk))
> > > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(clk), "no CAN
> > clk");
> > > +
> > > + if (clk) {
> > > + priv->can.clock.freq = clk_get_rate(clk) / 2;
> > > + if (!priv->can.clock.freq)
> > > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -EINVAL, "Zero
> > CAN clk rate");
> > > + }
> >
> > There's no clk_prepare_enable in the driver. You might go the quick and
> > dirty way an enable the clock right here. IIRC there's a new convenience
> > function to get and enable a clock, managed bei devm. Uwe (Cc'ed) can
> > point you in the right direction.
>
> + clk
>
> As per the patch history devm version for clk_prepare_enable is rejected[1], so the individual drivers implemented the same using devm_add_action_or_reset [2].
> So shall I implement devm version here as well?

You want to make use of 7ef9651e9792b08eb310c6beb202cbc947f43cab (which
is currently in next). If you cherry-pick this to an older kernel
version, make sure to also pick
8b3d743fc9e2542822826890b482afabf0e7522a.

Best regards
Uwe

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-03 10:16    [W:0.062 / U:0.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site