lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v8 04/16] clk: npcm8xx: add clock controller
From
Date
Quoting Tomer Maimon (2022-07-24 02:06:54)
> On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 at 06:02, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Furthermore, in DT, reg properties aren't supposed to overlap. When that
> > happens it usually indicates the DT is being written to describe driver
> > structure instead of the IP blocks that are delivered by the hardware
> > engineer. In this case it sounds like a combined clk and reset IP block
> > because they piled all the SoC glue stuff into a register range. Are
> > there more features in this IO range?
>
> No, this range only combined the reset and clock together, but it
> combined in a way that we cannot split it to two or even three
> different registers...

Because it is jumbled in some range?

>
> I do see a way to combine the clock and the reset driver, the NPCM
> reset driver is serving other NPCM BMC's.
> Should we use regmap to handle the clock registers instead of ioremap?

Sure? Using regmap or not looks like a parallel discussion. How does it
help use platform APIs?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-30 00:56    [W:0.366 / U:0.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site