Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] LoongArch: Support new relocation types | From | Xi Ruoyao <> | Date | Fri, 29 Jul 2022 18:36:05 +0800 |
| |
On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 18:18 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 17:49 +0800, Youling Tang wrote: > > Hi, Ruoyao > > > > Tested this series of patches v3 on a CLFS 5.5 system, using the new > > cross toolchain, > > $ dmesg | head > > [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.19.0-rc7new-toolchain+ (loongson@linux) > > (loongarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc (GCC) 13.0.0 20220726 (experimental) > > [master revision > > cf7eac5805e:1e0611b64d8:3fb68f2e666d9de7e0326af9f43b12c9e98f19a6], GNU > > ld (GNU Binutils) 2.39.50.20220726) #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Jul 29 05:24:15 > > EDT 2022 > > > > Relocation error when manually loading nf_tables.ko module, > > $ sudo modprobe nf_tables > > odprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'nf_tables': Exec format error > > > > $ dmesg > > [ 61.506737] kmod: module nf_tables: PCALA offset = 0x90007ffffed8c000 > > does not fit in 32-bit signed and is unsupported by kernel! dangerous > > apply_r_larch_pcala_hi20 (71) relocation > > > > Do you have the same problem over there? > > I can reproduce it with "modprobe x_tables". Will try to debug...
The relocation against local percpu variable is broken up. I'll try to fix it.
-- Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
| |