lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v2 4/5] hugetlb_cgroup: use helper macro NUMA_NO_NODE
Date
It's better to use NUMA_NO_NODE instead of magic number -1. Minor
readability improvement.

Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
---
mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c b/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
index 01a709468937..2affccfe59f1 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
@@ -154,9 +154,9 @@ hugetlb_cgroup_css_alloc(struct cgroup_subsys_state *parent_css)
* function.
*/
for_each_node(node) {
- /* Set node_to_alloc to -1 for offline nodes. */
+ /* Set node_to_alloc to NUMA_NO_NODE for offline nodes. */
int node_to_alloc =
- node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) ? node : -1;
+ node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) ? node : NUMA_NO_NODE;
h_cgroup->nodeinfo[node] =
kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct hugetlb_cgroup_per_node),
GFP_KERNEL, node_to_alloc);
--
2.23.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-29 10:04    [W:0.139 / U:1.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site