Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 28 Jul 2022 16:56:30 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/10] drm: use idr_init_base() over idr_init() if applicable | From | Danilo Krummrich <> |
| |
On 7/28/22 16:44, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 04:41:41PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 20:52:53 +0200, dakr@redhat.com wrote: >>> From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> >>> >>> This patch series initializes IDRs with idr_init_base(&idr, 1) rather than >>> idr_init(&idr) in case for the particular IDR no IDs < 1 are ever requested - >>> this avoids unnecessary tree walks. >>> >>> Danilo Krummrich (10): >>> drm/amdgpu: use idr_init_base() to initialize mgr->ctx_handles >>> drm/amdgpu: use idr_init_base() to initialize fpriv->bo_list_handles >>> drm: use idr_init_base() to initialize master->magic_map >>> drm: use idr_init_base() to initialize master->lessee_idr >>> drm: use idr_init_base() to initialize mode_config.object_idr >>> drm: use idr_init_base() to initialize mode_config.tile_idr >>> drm/sis: use idr_init_base() to initialize dev_priv->object_idr >>> drm/v3d: use idr_init_base() to initialize v3d_priv->perfmon.idr >>> drm/via: use idr_init_base() to initialize dev_priv->object_idr >>> drm/todo: remove task for idr_init_base() >>> >>> [...] >> >> Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-next).
Thanks.
> > The via driver had changed a bit and the patch 9 didn't apply at all. > I've moved the change to where it looked like it belonged, but you might > want to double check.
LGTM.
- Danilo > > Maxime
| |