Messages in this thread | | | From | Marcin Wojtas <> | Date | Mon, 25 Jul 2022 15:43:39 +0200 | Subject | Re: [net-next: PATCH] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix speed setting for CPU/DSA ports |
| |
pon., 25 lip 2022 o 15:32 Russell King (Oracle) <linux@armlinux.org.uk> napisał(a): > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 03:21:44PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 02:18:45AM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote: > > > I can of course apply both suggestions, however, I am wondering if I > > > should resend them at all, as Russell's series is still being > > > discussed. IMO it may be worth waiting whether it makes it before the > > > merge window - if not, I can resend this patch after v5.20-rc1, > > > targetting the net branch. What do you think? > > > > I just don't want a fix for a known regression to slip through the cracks. > > You can resend whenever you consider, but I believe that if you do so now > > (today or in the following few days), you won't conflict with anybody's work, > > considering that this has been said: > > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 11:57:20PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > > Well, at this point, I'm just going to give up with this kernel cycle. > > > It seems impossible to get this sorted. It seems impossible to move > > > forward with the conversion of Marvell DSA to phylink_pcs. > > That is correct - I'm not intending to submit it, because there's not > enough time to sort out the mess that has been created by comments > on the approach coming way too late. > > And in fact, I'm now _scared_ to submit a revision of it. I don't want > to get into writing lots more replies that take hours to compose only > to have responses that require yet more multi-hour sessions to reply > to, which only then lead to the cycle repeating with no sign of an end > to it. Something is very wrong with email as a communication tool when > things get to that point. > > So, I won't be working on this. Someone else can sort the problem. >
Thank you for the heads-up, I understand your concerns. I'll resubmit this patch then and rebase my 'fwnode_' v3 onto it.
Best regards, Marcin
| |