lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix RISC-V's arch-topology reporting
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 11:22:01AM +0000, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
> On 15/07/2022 18:51, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> >
> > Hey all,
> > It's my first time messing around with arch/ code at all, let alone
> > more than one arch, so forgive me if I have screwed up how to do a
> > migration like this.
> >
> > The goal here is the fix the incorrectly reported arch topology on
> > RISC-V which seems to have been broken since it was added.
> > cpu, package and thread IDs are all currently reported as -1, so tools
> > like lstopo think systems have multiple threads on the same core when
> > this is not true:
> > https://github.com/open-mpi/hwloc/issues/536
>
> Hey,
>
> Not got any feedback on the smpboot changes from the RISC-V side.
> I tested it on polarfire, the d1 (with both SMP & !SMP set iirc)
> & on the u540. It all looked good to me.
>
> I'd like to have this fixed for v5.20, but there isn't too much
> time left before the mw. Not too sure about the cross-tree changes,
> does it need an immutable branch or could it go through driver-core?
> Catalin suggested removing the CC stable from patch 1/2 & adding it
> as a dependency for the 2/2 patch - but obviously that's up to the
> committer to sort out.

I'm finalising the arm64 queue today, so I don't really want to pull in
additional changes beyond critical fixes at this point, I'm afraid. I was
half-expecting a pull request from the riscv side last week but I didn't
see anything.

FWIW, if there's still no movement by -rc1, then I'm happy to queue all
of this on its own branch in the arm64 tree for 5.21.

Let me know.

Will

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-25 11:14    [W:0.123 / U:1.652 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site