lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 3/5] PCI: axis: Add ARTPEC-8 PCIe controller driver
From
On 21/07/2022 22:58, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 11:04:00AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 20/07/2022 08:01, Wangseok Lee wrote:
>>> Add support Axis, ARTPEC-8 SoC. ARTPEC-8 is the SoC platform of Axis
>>> Communications. This is based on arm64 and support GEN4 & 2lane. This
>>> PCIe controller is based on DesignWare Hardware core and uses DesignWare
>>> core functions to implement the driver. "pcie-artpec6. c" supports artpec6
>>> and artpec7 H/W. artpec8 can not be expanded because H/W configuration is
>>> completely different from artpec6/7. PHY and sub controller are different.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wangseok Lee <wangseok.lee@samsung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jaeho Cho <jaeho79.cho@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>> v3->v4 :
>>> -Remove unnecessary enum type
>>> -Fix indentation
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the changes. This starts to look good, however I am not going
>> to ack it. This is also not a strong NAK, as I would respect Bjorn and
>> other maintainers decision.
>>
>> I don't like the approach of creating only Artpec-8 specific driver.
>> Samsung heavily reuses its block in all Exynos devices. Now it re-uses
>> them for other designs as well. Therefore, even if merging with existing
>> Exynos PCIe driver is not feasible (we had such discussions), I expect
>> this to cover all Samsung Foundry PCIe devices. From all current designs
>> up to future licensed blocks, including some new Samsung Exynos SoC. Or
>> at least be ready for it.
>
> I would certainly prefer fewer drivers but I don't know enough about
> the underlying IP and the places it's integrated to to know what's
> practical. The only way I could figure that out would be by manually
> comparing the drivers for similarity. I assume/expect all driver
> authors are doing that.

Merging with existing Exynos PCIe driver (and phy) might be indeed
tricky, as existing one does not support that much as here. However I
really expect that all current designs from Samsung - Exynos SoC, Artpec
and for other customers - have very similar PCIe thus this should be a
generic, new generation Samsung PCIe driver. If designed that way, also
the naming should be back Samsung specific, no Axis/Artpec.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-22 19:37    [W:0.148 / U:0.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site