lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] drm/edid: Make 144 Hz not preferred on Sharp LQ140M1JW46
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 9:48 AM Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 9:37 AM Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com> wrote:
> >
> > + sankeerth
> >
> > Hi Doug
> >
> > On 7/21/2022 3:23 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > > The Sharp LQ140M1JW46 panel is on the Qualcomm sc7280 CRD reference
> > > board. This panel supports 144 Hz and 60 Hz. In the EDID, the 144 Hz
> > > mode is listed first and thus is marked preferred. The EDID decode I
> > > ran says:
> > >
> > > First detailed timing includes the native pixel format and preferred
> > > refresh rate.
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Detailed Timing Descriptors:
> > > DTD 1: 1920x1080 143.981 Hz 16:9 166.587 kHz 346.500 MHz
> > > Hfront 48 Hsync 32 Hback 80 Hpol N
> > > Vfront 3 Vsync 5 Vback 69 Vpol N
> > > DTD 2: 1920x1080 59.990 Hz 16:9 69.409 kHz 144.370 MHz
> > > Hfront 48 Hsync 32 Hback 80 Hpol N
> > > Vfront 3 Vsync 5 Vback 69 Vpol N
> > >
> > > I'm proposing here that the above is actually a bug and that the 60 Hz
> > > mode really should be considered preferred by Linux.
> > >
> > > The argument here is that this is a laptop panel and on a laptop we
> > > know power will always be a concern. Presumably even if someone using
> > > this panel wanted to use 144 Hz for some use cases they would only do
> > > so dynamically and would still want the default to be 60 Hz.
> > >
> > > Let's change the default to 60 Hz using a standard quirk.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> >
> > Yes, we were aware that 144Hz was getting picked. We found that while
> > debugging the screen corruption issue.
> >
> > Well, yes power would be less with 60Hz but so will be the performance.
>
> What performance specifically will be less with 60 Hz? In general the
> sc7280 CPU is a bit memory-bandwidth constrained and the LCD refresh
> from memory is a non-trivial part of that. Reducing to 60 Hz will
> relieve some of the memory bandwidth pressure and will actually allow
> tasks on the CPU to run _faster_. I guess the downside is that some
> animations might be a little less smooth...

I guess he is referring to something that is vblank sync'd running
faster than 60fps.

but OTOH it is a bit of a waste for fbcon to be using 144Hz. And
there are enough android games that limit themselves to 30fps to save
your "phone" battery. So it seems a lot more sane to default to 60Hz
and let userspace that knows it wants more pick the 144Hz rate when
needed.

BR,
-R

>
>
> > The test teams have been validating with 144Hz so far so we are checking
> > internally with the team whether its OKAY to goto 60Hz now since that
> > kind of invalidates the testing they have been doing.
>
> You're worried that the panel itself won't work well at 60 Hz, or
> something else about the system won't? The whole system in general
> needs to work well with 60 Hz displays and I expect them to be much
> more common than 144 Hz displays. Quite honestly if switching to 60 Hz
> uncovers a problem that would be a huge benefit of landing this patch
> because it would mean we'd find it now rather than down the road when
> someone hooks up a different panel.
>
> -Doug

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-22 19:37    [W:2.999 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site