Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Jul 2022 15:35:48 +0000 | From | Daniel Müller <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] bpf: Fix typo in comments in verifier |
| |
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 02:52:31PM +0800, Kuee K1r0a wrote: > Replace 'then' with 'than'. > > Fixes: f4d7e40a5b71 ("bpf: introduce function calls (verification)") > Signed-off-by: Kuee K1r0a <liulin063@gmail.com> > --- > kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c > index 0efbac0fd126..4da1a7c7657a 100644 > --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c > +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c > @@ -1167,7 +1167,7 @@ static int copy_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *dst_state, > return -ENOMEM; > dst_state->jmp_history_cnt = src->jmp_history_cnt; > > - /* if dst has more stack frames then src frame, free them */ > + /* if dst has more stack frames than src frame, free them */
Should we use plural as well, 'src frames'?
[...]
I believe the patch prefix should indicate which branch the patch targets as well. E.g., [PATCH bpf-next]. Looks good to me otherwise.
Acked-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
| |