Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Jul 2022 11:30:54 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] nvme-pci: fix hang during error recovery when the PCI device is isolated | From | Stefan Roese <> |
| |
On 12.07.22 16:17, Keith Busch wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 02:44:53PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote: >> On s390 and powerpc PCI devices are isolated when an error is detected >> and driver->err_handler->error_detected is called with an inaccessible >> PCI device and PCI channel state set to pci_channel_io_frozen >> (see Step 1 in Documentation/PCI/pci-error-recovery.rst). >> >> In the case of NVMe devices nvme_error_detected() then calls >> nvme_dev_disable(dev, false) and requests a reset. After a successful >> reset the device is accessible again and nvme_slot_reset() resets the >> controller and queues nvme_reset_work() which then recovers the >> controller. >> >> Since commit b98235d3a471 ("nvme-pci: harden drive presence detect in >> nvme_dev_disable()") however nvme_dev_disable() no longer freezes the >> queues if pci_device_is_present() returns false. This is the case for an >> isolated PCI device. In principle this makes sense as there are no >> accessible hardware queues to run. The problem though is that for >> a previously live reset controller with online queues nvme_reset_work() >> calls nvme_wait_freeze() which, without the freeze having been >> initiated, then hangs forever. Fix this by starting the freeze in >> nvme_slot_reset() which is the earliest point where we know the device >> should be accessible again. >> >> Fixes: b98235d3a471 ("nvme-pci: harden drive presence detect in nvme_dev_disable()") >> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com> > > Oh, we've messed up the expected sequence. The mistaken assumption is a device > not present means we're about to unbind from it, but it could appear that way > just for normal error handling and reset, so we need to preserve the previous > handling. > > The offending commit really just wants to avoid the register access (which we > shouldn't have to do, but hey, broken hardware...).
Correct.
> So let's keep the sequence > the same as before and just skip the register read. Does this work for you? > > --- > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > index fdfee3e590db..c40e82cee735 100644 > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > static void nvme_dev_remove_admin(struct nvme_dev *dev) > @@ -2690,9 +2772,11 @@ static void nvme_dev_disable(struct nvme_dev *dev, bool shutdown) > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev->dev); > > mutex_lock(&dev->shutdown_lock); > - if (pci_device_is_present(pdev) && pci_is_enabled(pdev)) { > - u32 csts = readl(dev->bar + NVME_REG_CSTS); > + if (pci_is_enabled(pdev)) { > + u32 csts = ~0; > > + if (pci_device_is_present(pdev)) > + csts = readl(dev->bar + NVME_REG_CSTS); > if (dev->ctrl.state == NVME_CTRL_LIVE || > dev->ctrl.state == NVME_CTRL_RESETTING) { > freeze = true; > --
Thanks. Looks good to me. So if anyone whats to send a proper patch with this change, feel free to add my:
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Thanks, Stefan
| |