lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/2] asm-generic: Remove pci.h copying remaining code to x86
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 6:33 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 12:34:52PM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > The generic pci.h header now only provides a definition of
> > pci_get_legacy_ide_irq which is used by architectures that support PNP.
> > Of the architectures that use asm-generic/pci.h this is only x86.
>
> Please move this into a separate header, ike legacy-ide.h. It doens't
> have anyting to do with actual PCI support.

It looks like asm/libata-portmap.h is meant to have this information already,
and this is what libata uses, while drivers/ide used the
pci_get_legacy_ide_irq()
function for the same purpose.

Only ia64 and powerpc have interesting definitions of both, and they
return the same thing, so I think this is sufficient to remove the last caller:

diff --git a/drivers/pnp/resource.c b/drivers/pnp/resource.c
index 2fa0f7d55259..d7a6250589d6 100644
--- a/drivers/pnp/resource.c
+++ b/drivers/pnp/resource.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/dma.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>
-#include <linux/pci.h>
+#include <linux/libata.h>
#include <linux/ioport.h>
#include <linux/init.h>

@@ -322,8 +322,8 @@ static int pci_dev_uses_irq(struct pnp_dev *pnp,
struct pci_dev *pci,
* treat the compatibility IRQs as busy.
*/
if ((progif & 0x5) != 0x5)
- if (pci_get_legacy_ide_irq(pci, 0) == irq ||
- pci_get_legacy_ide_irq(pci, 1) == irq) {
+ if (ATA_PRIMARY_IRQ(pci) == irq ||
+ ATA_SECONDARY_IRQ(pci) == irq) {
pnp_dbg(&pnp->dev, " legacy IDE device %s "
"using irq %d\n", pci_name(pci), irq);
return 1;
This is fine on the architectures that currently return an error from
pci_get_legacy_ide_irq() but will change to returning 15/14 instead,
because they do not support ISA devices, so pci_dev_uses_irq()
will never be called either.

Arnd

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-18 10:41    [W:0.053 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site