Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] thermal/core: Avoid calling ->get_trip_temp() unnecessarily | From | Zhang Rui <> | Date | Mon, 18 Jul 2022 12:59:04 +0800 |
| |
On Fri, 2022-07-15 at 23:09 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > As the trip temperature is already available when calling the > function > handle_critical_trips(), pass it as a parameter instead of having > this > function calling the ops again to retrieve the same data. > > Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> > --- > v3: > - Massaged the patch title and the description > --- > drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 8 ++------ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c > b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c > index d9f771b15ed8..f66036b3daae 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c > @@ -340,12 +340,8 @@ void thermal_zone_device_critical(struct > thermal_zone_device *tz) > EXPORT_SYMBOL(thermal_zone_device_critical); > > static void handle_critical_trips(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, > - int trip, enum thermal_trip_type > trip_type) > + int trip, int trip_temp, enum > thermal_trip_type trip_type)
This indent cleanup belongs to patch 1/4. Other than that,
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> { > - int trip_temp; > - > - tz->ops->get_trip_temp(tz, trip, &trip_temp); > - > /* If we have not crossed the trip_temp, we do not care. */ > if (trip_temp <= 0 || tz->temperature < trip_temp) > return; > @@ -394,7 +390,7 @@ static void handle_thermal_trip(struct > thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip) > handle_thermal_trip_crossed(tz, trip, trip_temp, hyst, type); > > if (type == THERMAL_TRIP_CRITICAL || type == > THERMAL_TRIP_HOT) > - handle_critical_trips(tz, trip, type); > + handle_critical_trips(tz, trip, trip_temp, type); > else > handle_non_critical_trips(tz, trip); > /*
| |