Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Jul 2022 22:37:34 +0200 | From | Christian Marangi <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] regmap: permit to set reg_update_bits with bulk implementation |
| |
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 04:44:23PM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 03:42:06PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 03:48:52PM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote: > > > > > thanks, assuming everything went smooth with the merge to linux-next and > > > no problems arise, can you provide a signed tag? > > > > > This is needed for a net-next series that is currently in RFC state as > > > it does depends on this. > > > > > (I had this problem before and it was said that in this kind of > > > situation I had to ask for a signed tag to merge the related patch in > > > net-next branch) > > > > Oh, it would have been good to know about this when reviewing the patch > > rather than after the fact - since this hadn't been mentioned it's now > > applied on the main development branch with everything that's going into > > the next release rather than on a separate branch for easy merging > > elsewhere. How urgent is this, given that the merge window is likely to > > open at the weekend so this'll get sent to Linus at that point - is the > > driver otherwise near merging? > > Ohh sorry, I was too generic in the patch comments and didn't mention it > was an actual dependency. > > It's not too urgent, (I assume) but it was said that it was preferrable > to have the changes done in 2 weeks window (the one in net-next about > the working driver). Will ask on net-next and give you news ASAP. >
Hi Mark, sorry for the delay, I pointed out this problem with net-next and we decided to adopt a workaround so this is not urgent anymore and we can wait the merge window to have this change in net-next.
The required code will be updated later when this change is merged.
-- Ansuel
| |