lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] Use lightweigt version of bpftool
From
Date


On 2022/7/16 1:15, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> On 15/07/2022 17:56, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 7:16 PM Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Currently, samples/bpf, tools/runqslower and bpf/iterators use bpftool
>>> for vmlinux.h, skeleton, and static linking only. We can uselightweight
>>> bootstrap version of bpftool to handle these, and it will be faster.
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> - make libbpf and bootstrap bpftool independent. and make it simple.
>>>
>>
>> Quentin, does this patch set look good to you?
>
> [Apologies, the mail server has been filtering Pu's emails as spam for
> some reason and I had missed the discussion :s]
>
> Looks OK to me:
> Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
>
> Although I'm a bit sorry to see the sharing of libbpf between bpftool
> and libbpf go away. But OK. We can maybe reintroduce it through
> bpftool's Makefile or a separate include Makefile in the future.
>
> Quentin
> .

Hi, Quentin,

so much thanks for your review and ack. and apologies for not receiving
your advice in time due to the misconfiguration of mail server[0]. and
looking forward to your improvement for bpftool.

[0]https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220523152516.7sr247i3bzwhr44w@quack3.lan/

>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-16 09:14    [W:0.097 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site