lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH V12 01/20] uapi: simplify __ARCH_FLOCK{,64}_PAD a little
From


On 4/5/2022 12:12 AM, guoren@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> Don't bother to define the symbols empty, just don't use them.
> That makes the intent a little more clear.
>
> Remove the unused HAVE_ARCH_STRUCT_FLOCK64 define and merge the
> 32-bit mips struct flock into the generic one.
>
> Add a new __ARCH_FLOCK_EXTRA_SYSID macro following the style of
> __ARCH_FLOCK_PAD to avoid having a separate definition just for
> one architecture.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>

Being late to this, but this breaks the perf build for me using a MIPS
toolchain with the following:

CC
/home/fainelli/work/buildroot/output/bmips/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/trace/beauty/fcntl.o
In file included from
../../../../host/mipsel-buildroot-linux-gnu/sysroot/usr/include/asm/fcntl.h:77,
from ../include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h:5,
from trace/beauty/fcntl.c:10:
../include/uapi/asm-generic/fcntl.h:188:8: error: redefinition of
'struct flock'
struct flock {
^~~~~
In file included from ../include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h:5,
from trace/beauty/fcntl.c:10:
../../../../host/mipsel-buildroot-linux-gnu/sysroot/usr/include/asm/fcntl.h:63:8:
note: originally defined here
struct flock {
^~~~~
make[6]: ***
[/home/fainelli/work/buildroot/output/bmips/build/linux-custom/tools/build/Makefile.build:97:
/home/fainelli/work/buildroot/output/bmips/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/trace/beauty/fcntl.o]
Error 1

the kernel headers are set to 4.1.31 which is arguably old but
toolchains using newer kernel headers do not fare much better either
unfortunately as I tried a toolchain with kernel headers 4.9.x.

I will start doing more regular MIPS builds of the perf tools since that
seems to escape our testing.

Thanks!
--
Florian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-15 05:15    [W:0.747 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site