lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [mm-unstable PATCH v6 3/8] mm, hwpoison, hugetlb: support saving mechanism of raw error pages
Date
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 12:51:30PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2022/7/12 11:28, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
> >
> > When handling memory error on a hugetlb page, the error handler tries to
> > dissolve and turn it into 4kB pages. If it's successfully dissolved,
> > PageHWPoison flag is moved to the raw error page, so that's all right.
> > However, dissolve sometimes fails, then the error page is left as
> > hwpoisoned hugepage. It's useful if we can retry to dissolve it to save
> > healthy pages, but that's not possible now because the information about
> > where the raw error pages is lost.
> >
> > Use the private field of a few tail pages to keep that information. The
> > code path of shrinking hugepage pool uses this info to try delayed dissolve.
> > In order to remember multiple errors in a hugepage, a singly-linked list
> > originated from SUBPAGE_INDEX_HWPOISON-th tail page is constructed. Only
> > simple operations (adding an entry or clearing all) are required and the
> > list is assumed not to be very long, so this simple data structure should
> > be enough.
> >
> > If we failed to save raw error info, the hwpoison hugepage has errors on
> > unknown subpage, then this new saving mechanism does not work any more,
> > so disable saving new raw error info and freeing hwpoison hugepages.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> This patch looks good to me with some nits below.
>
> > ---
> ...
> > +static int hugetlb_set_page_hwpoison(struct page *hpage, struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + struct llist_head *head;
> > + struct raw_hwp_page *raw_hwp;
> > + struct llist_node *t, *tnode;
> > + int ret = TestSetPageHWPoison(hpage) ? -EHWPOISON : 0;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Once the hwpoison hugepage has lost reliable raw error info,
> > + * there is little meaning to keep additional error info precisely,
> > + * so skip to add additional raw error info.
> > + */
> > + if (HPageRawHwpUnreliable(hpage))
> > + return -EHWPOISON;
> > + head = raw_hwp_list_head(hpage);
> > + llist_for_each_safe(tnode, t, head->first) {
> > + struct raw_hwp_page *p = container_of(tnode, struct raw_hwp_page, node);
> > +
> > + if (p->page == page)
> > + return -EHWPOISON;
> > + }
> > +
> > + raw_hwp = kmalloc(sizeof(struct raw_hwp_page), GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + if (raw_hwp) {
> > + raw_hwp->page = page;
> > + llist_add(&raw_hwp->node, head);
> > + /* the first error event will be counted in action_result(). */
> > + if (ret)
> > + num_poisoned_pages_inc();
> > + } else {
> > + /*
> > + * Failed to save raw error info. We no longer trace all
> > + * hwpoisoned subpages, and we need refuse to free/dissolve
> > + * this hwpoisoned hugepage.
> > + */
> > + SetHPageRawHwpUnreliable(hpage);
>
> IMHO, when HPageRawHwpUnreliable is set, we can simply free the raw_hwp_list here
> to save some memory as they're not used anymore.

Yes, that's possible. Let's do this.

>
> > + }
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void hugetlb_clear_page_hwpoison(struct page *hpage)
> > +{
> > + struct llist_head *head;
> > + struct llist_node *t, *tnode;
> > +
> > + if (!HPageRawHwpUnreliable(hpage))
> > + ClearPageHWPoison(hpage);
> > + head = raw_hwp_list_head(hpage);
> > + llist_for_each_safe(tnode, t, head->first) {
> > + struct raw_hwp_page *p = container_of(tnode, struct raw_hwp_page, node);
> > +
> > + SetPageHWPoison(p->page);
> > + kfree(p);
> > + }
> > + llist_del_all(head);
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Called from hugetlb code with hugetlb_lock held.
> > *
> > @@ -1698,7 +1771,7 @@ int __get_huge_page_for_hwpoison(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > - if (TestSetPageHWPoison(head)) {
> > + if (hugetlb_set_page_hwpoison(head, page)) {
> > ret = -EHWPOISON;
> > goto out;
> > }
> > @@ -1710,7 +1783,6 @@ int __get_huge_page_for_hwpoison(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
> > /*
> > * Taking refcount of hugetlb pages needs extra care about race conditions
> > * with basic operations like hugepage allocation/free/demotion.
> > @@ -1751,7 +1823,7 @@ static int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, int *hugetlb
> > lock_page(head);
> >
> > if (hwpoison_filter(p)) {
> > - ClearPageHWPoison(head);
> > + hugetlb_clear_page_hwpoison(head);
>
> If the code reach here, the hugetlb page should be poisoned first time or it will return
> in above "res == -EHWPOISON" case. So ClearPageHWPoison should be fine here. But this change
> will do the same thing while making the code more consistent. So it should be fine. :)

Right, this change is for consistency.

>
> > res = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
>
> Anyway, for what it worth,
>
> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
>
> Thanks!

Thank you.
- Naoya Horiguchi
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-13 13:56    [W:0.057 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site