Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <> | Subject | [PATCH] cpufreq: mediatek: Handle sram regulator probe deferral | Date | Wed, 13 Jul 2022 13:15:36 +0200 |
| |
If the regulator_get_optional() call for the SRAM regulator returns a probe deferral, we must bail out and retry probing later: failing to do this will produce unstabilities on platforms requiring the handling for this regulator.
Fixes: ffa7bdf7f344 ("cpufreq: mediatek: Make sram regulator optional") Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> --- drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c index 3a2be4552020..7f2680bc9a0f 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c @@ -439,9 +439,13 @@ static int mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info, int cpu) /* Both presence and absence of sram regulator are valid cases. */ info->sram_reg = regulator_get_optional(cpu_dev, "sram"); - if (IS_ERR(info->sram_reg)) + if (IS_ERR(info->sram_reg)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(info->sram_reg); + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) + goto out_free_resources; + info->sram_reg = NULL; - else { + } else { ret = regulator_enable(info->sram_reg); if (ret) { dev_warn(cpu_dev, "cpu%d: failed to enable vsram\n", cpu); -- 2.35.1
| |