lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v14 13/17] PCI: imx6: Reduce resume time by only starting link if it was up before suspend
From
Date
Am Freitag, dem 01.07.2022 um 11:25 +0800 schrieb Richard Zhu:
> Because i.MX PCIe doesn't support hot-plug feature. In the link down
> scenario, only start the PCIe link training in resume when the link is up
> before system suspend to avoid the long latency in the link training
> period.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> index e236f824c808..5a06fbca82d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct imx6_pcie {
> struct dw_pcie *pci;
> int reset_gpio;
> bool gpio_active_high;
> + bool link_is_up;
> struct clk *pcie_bus;
> struct clk *pcie_phy;
> struct clk *pcie_inbound_axi;
> @@ -881,11 +882,13 @@ static int imx6_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> dev_info(dev, "Link: Gen2 disabled\n");
> }
>
> + imx6_pcie->link_is_up = true;
> tmp = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKSTA);
> dev_info(dev, "Link up, Gen%i\n", tmp & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_CLS);
> return 0;
>
> err_reset_phy:
> + imx6_pcie->link_is_up = false;
> dev_dbg(dev, "PHY DEBUG_R0=0x%08x DEBUG_R1=0x%08x\n",
> dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_DEBUG0),
> dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_DEBUG1));
> @@ -1032,9 +1035,8 @@ static int imx6_pcie_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
> return ret;
> dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp);
>
> - ret = imx6_pcie_start_link(imx6_pcie->pci);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - dev_info(dev, "pcie link is down after resume.\n");
> + if (imx6_pcie->link_is_up)
> + imx6_pcie_start_link(imx6_pcie->pci);

While the change itself is correct, the removal of the return value
check should be added to the previous patch, as that's the point where
you change this function to always return 0, rendering this check
pointless.

Regards,
Lucas

>
> return 0;
> }


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-13 10:49    [W:0.166 / U:1.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site