Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 Jul 2022 09:56:10 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Return true/false (not 1/0) from bool functions | From | Linkui Xiao <> |
| |
Thanks for your suggestion, I'll clean it up
On 7/13/22 23:55, sdf@google.com wrote: > On 07/13, xiaolinkui wrote: >> From: Linkui Xiao<xiaolinkui@kylinos.cn> > ^ space here? > >> Return boolean values ("true" or "false") instead of 1 or 0 from bool >> functions. This fixes the following warnings from coccicheck: > >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c:407:9-10: WARNING: >> return of 0/1 in function 'decap_v4' with return type bool >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c:389:9-10: WARNING: >> return of 0/1 in function 'decap_v6' with return type bool >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c:290:9-10: WARNING: >> return of 0/1 in function 'encap_v6' with return type bool >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c:264:9-10: WARNING: >> return of 0/1 in function 'parse_tcp' with return type bool >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c:242:9-10: WARNING: >> return of 0/1 in function 'parse_udp' with return type bool > >> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/boolreturn.cocci > >> Signed-off-by: Linkui Xiao<xiaolinkui@kylinos.cn> > > This patch likely needs a resend with proper [PATCH bpf] or > [PATCH bpf-next] subject to end up in patchwork and to be picked up. > > Take a look at Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst section "Q: How do I > indicate which tree (bpf vs. bpf-next) my patch should be applied to?". > > Since that's a cleanup, you most likely want to target bpf-next. > >> --- >> .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c | 30 +++++++++---------- >> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c >> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c >> index 125d872d7981..ba48fcb98ab2 100644 >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c >> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ bool parse_udp(void *data, void *data_end, >> udp = data + off; > >> if (udp + 1 > data_end) >> - return 0; >> + return false; >> if (!is_icmp) { >> pckt->flow.port16[0] = udp->source; >> pckt->flow.port16[1] = udp->dest; >> @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ bool parse_udp(void *data, void *data_end, >> pckt->flow.port16[0] = udp->dest; >> pckt->flow.port16[1] = udp->source; >> } >> - return 1; >> + return true; >> } > >> static __attribute__ ((noinline)) >> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ bool parse_tcp(void *data, void *data_end, > >> tcp = data + off; >> if (tcp + 1 > data_end) >> - return 0; >> + return false; >> if (tcp->syn) >> pckt->flags |= (1 << 1); >> if (!is_icmp) { >> @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ bool parse_tcp(void *data, void *data_end, >> pckt->flow.port16[0] = tcp->dest; >> pckt->flow.port16[1] = tcp->source; >> } >> - return 1; >> + return true; >> } > >> static __attribute__ ((noinline)) >> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ bool encap_v6(struct xdp_md *xdp, struct >> ctl_value *cval, >> void *data; > >> if (bpf_xdp_adjust_head(xdp, 0 - (int)sizeof(struct ipv6hdr))) >> - return 0; >> + return false; >> data = (void *)(long)xdp->data; >> data_end = (void *)(long)xdp->data_end; >> new_eth = data; >> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ bool encap_v6(struct xdp_md *xdp, struct >> ctl_value *cval, >> old_eth = data + sizeof(struct ipv6hdr); >> if (new_eth + 1 > data_end || >> old_eth + 1 > data_end || ip6h + 1 > data_end) >> - return 0; >> + return false; >> memcpy(new_eth->eth_dest, cval->mac, 6); >> memcpy(new_eth->eth_source, old_eth->eth_dest, 6); >> new_eth->eth_proto = 56710; >> @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ bool encap_v6(struct xdp_md *xdp, struct >> ctl_value *cval, >> ip6h->saddr.in6_u.u6_addr32[2] = 3; >> ip6h->saddr.in6_u.u6_addr32[3] = ip_suffix; >> memcpy(ip6h->daddr.in6_u.u6_addr32, dst->dstv6, 16); >> - return 1; >> + return true; >> } > >> static __attribute__ ((noinline)) >> @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ bool encap_v4(struct xdp_md *xdp, struct >> ctl_value *cval, >> ip_suffix <<= 15; >> ip_suffix ^= pckt->flow.src; >> if (bpf_xdp_adjust_head(xdp, 0 - (int)sizeof(struct iphdr))) >> - return 0; >> + return false; >> data = (void *)(long)xdp->data; >> data_end = (void *)(long)xdp->data_end; >> new_eth = data; >> @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ bool encap_v4(struct xdp_md *xdp, struct >> ctl_value *cval, >> old_eth = data + sizeof(struct iphdr); >> if (new_eth + 1 > data_end || >> old_eth + 1 > data_end || iph + 1 > data_end) >> - return 0; >> + return false; >> memcpy(new_eth->eth_dest, cval->mac, 6); >> memcpy(new_eth->eth_source, old_eth->eth_dest, 6); >> new_eth->eth_proto = 8; >> @@ -367,8 +367,8 @@ bool encap_v4(struct xdp_md *xdp, struct >> ctl_value *cval, >> csum += *next_iph_u16++; >> iph->check = ~((csum & 0xffff) + (csum >> 16)); >> if (bpf_xdp_adjust_head(xdp, (int)sizeof(struct iphdr))) >> - return 0; >> - return 1; >> + return false; >> + return true; >> } > >> static __attribute__ ((noinline)) >> @@ -386,10 +386,10 @@ bool decap_v6(struct xdp_md *xdp, void **data, >> void **data_end, bool inner_v4) >> else >> new_eth->eth_proto = 56710; >> if (bpf_xdp_adjust_head(xdp, (int)sizeof(struct ipv6hdr))) >> - return 0; >> + return false; >> *data = (void *)(long)xdp->data; >> *data_end = (void *)(long)xdp->data_end; >> - return 1; >> + return true; >> } > >> static __attribute__ ((noinline)) >> @@ -404,10 +404,10 @@ bool decap_v4(struct xdp_md *xdp, void **data, >> void **data_end) >> memcpy(new_eth->eth_dest, old_eth->eth_dest, 6); >> new_eth->eth_proto = 8; >> if (bpf_xdp_adjust_head(xdp, (int)sizeof(struct iphdr))) >> - return 0; >> + return false; >> *data = (void *)(long)xdp->data; >> *data_end = (void *)(long)xdp->data_end; >> - return 1; >> + return true; >> } > >> static __attribute__ ((noinline)) >> -- >> 2.17.1 >
| |