Messages in this thread | | | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Date | Wed, 13 Jul 2022 11:10:14 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Convert to YAML bindings |
| |
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 20:45, Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml > + soc { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + > + cpufreq@17d43000 { > + compatible = "qcom,cpufreq-hw"; > + reg = <0x17d43000 0x1400>, <0x17d45800 0x1400>; > + reg-names = "freq-domain0", "freq-domain1"; > + > + clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>, <&gcc GPLL0>; > + clock-names = "xo", "alternate"; > + > + #freq-domain-cells = <1>; > + }; > + };
Why didn't we migrate to #performance-domain-cells here ? We can keep the kernel backward compatible to support old DT definitions, but won't it be better to move to a more generic solution, now that we have one ?
| |