lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 05/14] staging: r8188eu: use a local buffer for efuse data
From
On 7/12/22 07:25, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 07:09:51PM +0200, Martin Kaiser wrote:
>> The efuse_eeprom_data array in struct eeprom_priv is used only by
>> ReadAdapterInfo8188EU. We can remove efuse_eeprom_data and use a local
>> buffer instead.
>>
>> Use EFUSE_MAP_LEN_88E as buffer size. Its value is the same as
>> HWSET_MAX_SIZE_512. The functions that access the buffer use
>> EFUSE_MAP_LEN_88E for its size.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_halinit.c | 23 ++++++++++----------
>> drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/rtw_eeprom.h | 3 ---
>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_halinit.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_halinit.c
>> index 18c2817bf1e3..807d8ce8cbfc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_halinit.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_halinit.c
>> @@ -929,6 +929,7 @@ void ReadAdapterInfo8188EU(struct adapter *Adapter)
>> {
>> struct eeprom_priv *eeprom = &Adapter->eeprompriv;
>> struct led_priv *ledpriv = &Adapter->ledpriv;
>> + u8 efuse_buf[EFUSE_MAP_LEN_88E] __aligned(4);
>
> This is 512 bytes. We used to be slightly worried about declaring 512
> bytes on the stack, but I'm not sure the situation now.
>

I think we should still avoid using an on-stack buffer of that size. It is
better to use a local pointer, and kmalloc() the buffer and free it before exit.

Larry

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-12 15:46    [W:0.065 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site