lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -final] x86/clear_user: Make it faster
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 12:33:20PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 12:24:12PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 07:01:06PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >
> > > + asm volatile(
> > > + "1:\n\t"
> > > + ALTERNATIVE_3("rep stosb",
> > > + "call clear_user_erms", ALT_NOT(X86_FEATURE_FSRM),
> > > + "call clear_user_rep_good", ALT_NOT(X86_FEATURE_ERMS),
> > > + "call clear_user_original", ALT_NOT(X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD))
> > > + "2:\n"
> > > + _ASM_EXTABLE_UA(1b, 2b)
> > > + : "+&c" (size), "+&D" (addr), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT
> > > + : "a" (0)
> > > + /* rep_good clobbers %rdx */
> > > + : "rdx");
> >
> > "+c" and "+D" should be enough for 1 instruction assembly?
>
> I'm looking at
>
> e0a96129db57 ("x86: use early clobbers in usercopy*.c")
>
> which introduced the early clobbers and I'm thinking we want them
> because "this operand is an earlyclobber operand, which is written
> before the instruction is finished using the input operands" and we have
> exception handling.
>
> But maybe you need to be more verbose as to what you mean exactly...

This is the original code:

-#define __do_strncpy_from_user(dst,src,count,res) \
-do { \
- long __d0, __d1, __d2; \
- might_fault(); \
- __asm__ __volatile__( \
- " testq %1,%1\n" \
- " jz 2f\n" \
- "0: lodsb\n" \
- " stosb\n" \
- " testb %%al,%%al\n" \
- " jz 1f\n" \
- " decq %1\n" \
- " jnz 0b\n" \
- "1: subq %1,%0\n" \
- "2:\n" \
- ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \
- "3: movq %5,%0\n" \
- " jmp 2b\n" \
- ".previous\n" \
- _ASM_EXTABLE(0b,3b) \
- : "=&r"(res), "=&c"(count), "=&a" (__d0), "=&S" (__d1), \
- "=&D" (__d2) \
- : "i"(-EFAULT), "0"(count), "1"(count), "3"(src), "4"(dst) \
- : "memory"); \
-} while (0)

I meant to say that earlyclobber is necessary only because the asm body
is more than 1 instruction so there is possibility of writing to some
outputs before all inputs are consumed.

If asm body is 1 insn there is no such possibility at all.
Now "rep stosb" is 1 instruction and two alterantive functions masquarade
as single instruction.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-12 14:33    [W:0.075 / U:1.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site