lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 25/33] ata/drivers/ahci_imx: Switch to new of thermal API
From
On 7/11/22 18:14, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 11/07/2022 01:18, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 7/11/22 06:24, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> The thermal OF code has a new API allowing to migrate the OF
>>> initialization to a simpler approach.
>>>
>>> Use this new API.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linexp.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/ata/ahci_imx.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_imx.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_imx.c
>>> index 79aa9f285312..5ad9a890e71a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_imx.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_imx.c
>>> @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static int read_adc_sum(void *dev, u16 rtune_ctl_reg, void __iomem * mmio)
>>> }
>>>
>>> /* SATA AHCI temperature monitor */
>>> -static int sata_ahci_read_temperature(void *dev, int *temp)
>>> +static int __sata_ahci_read_temperature(void *dev, int *temp)
>>> {
>>> u16 mpll_test_reg, rtune_ctl_reg, dac_ctl_reg, read_sum;
>>> u32 str1, str2, str3, str4;
>>> @@ -416,6 +416,11 @@ static int sata_ahci_read_temperature(void *dev, int *temp)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int sata_ahci_read_temperature(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp)
>>> +{
>>> + return __sata_ahci_read_temperature(tz->devdata, temp);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static ssize_t sata_ahci_show_temp(struct device *dev,
>>> struct device_attribute *da,
>>> char *buf)
>>> @@ -423,14 +428,14 @@ static ssize_t sata_ahci_show_temp(struct device *dev,
>>> unsigned int temp = 0;
>>> int err;
>>>
>>> - err = sata_ahci_read_temperature(dev, &temp);
>>> + err = __sata_ahci_read_temperature(dev, &temp);
>>> if (err < 0)
>>> return err;
>>>
>>> return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", temp);
>>> }
>>
>> I do not see why the above changes are necessary. Please explain.
>
> sata_ahci_read_temperature() is used by sata_ahci_show_temp() also.
>
> So in order to change the function prototype for the get_temp ops which
> does not take a void* but a thermal_zone_device* structure, this
> function wraps the call.
>
> Do you prefer sata_ahci_read_temperature() becomes sata_ahci_get_temp()
> and keep __sata_ahci_read_temperature() name untouched ?

Understood. You can keep the name changes you have, but please add this
explanation to the commit message.

>
>>>
>>> -static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops fsl_sata_ahci_of_thermal_ops = {
>>> +static struct thermal_zone_device_ops fsl_sata_ahci_of_thermal_ops = {
>>
>> Why remove the const ?
>>
>>> .get_temp = sata_ahci_read_temperature,
>>> };
>>>
>>> @@ -1131,8 +1136,8 @@ static int imx_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> ret = PTR_ERR(hwmon_dev);
>>> goto disable_clk;
>>> }
>>> - devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(hwmon_dev, 0, hwmon_dev,
>>> - &fsl_sata_ahci_of_thermal_ops);
>>> + devm_thermal_of_zone_register(hwmon_dev, 0, hwmon_dev,
>>> + &fsl_sata_ahci_of_thermal_ops);
>>
>> This is the only change that seems necessary.
>>
>>> dev_info(dev, "%s: sensor 'sata_ahci'\n", dev_name(hwmon_dev));
>>> }
>>>
>>
>> And it is hard to review a patch without the full series for context.
>> Please send all patches next time.
>>
>>
>
>


--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-11 13:17    [W:0.597 / U:0.244 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site