lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Enable clocks only after PARF_PHY setup for rev 2.1.0
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 21:22, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> [+cc Robert since I resolved a conflict in his patch, -cc stable]
>
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 03:03:34AM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 06:01:55PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 12:27:43AM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > > > We currently enable clocks BEFORE we write to PARF_PHY_CTRL reg to
> > > > enable clocks and resets. This case the driver to never set to a ready
> > > > state with the error 'Phy link never came up'.
> > > >
> > > > This in fact is caused by the phy clock getting enabled before setting
> > > > the required bits in the PARF regs.
> > > >
> > > > A workaround for this was set but with this new discovery we can drop
> > > > the workaround and use a proper solution to the problem by just enabling
> > > > the clock only AFTER the PARF_PHY_CTRL bit is set.
> > > >
> > > > This correctly setup the pcie line and makes it usable even when a
> > > > bootloader leave the pcie line to a underfined state.
> > >
> > > Is "pcie" here a signal name? Maybe this refers to the "PCIe link"?
> >
> > no i was referring to PCIe link. Fell free to fix it if it's not a
> > problem (or if you want i can just resend)
>
> I fixed it.
>
> > Think something went wrong in the rebase as the patch fixup is reverted.
> >
> > 11946f8b6e77a6794c111aafef7772e9967d9a54 is still wrong.
> >
> > clk_bulk_prepare_enable must be after
> > writel(val, pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL);
> > so in the post init.
>
> My error, sorry. I updated it, current head:
>
> 1a88605a3efd ("dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Fix description typo")
>
> Robert, your patch that I updated is:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git/commit/?h=pci/ctrl/qcom-pending&id=cdb32283bcf202d0db512abb80794056d44e7e9f
>
> It would still be nice to get an ack from one of the maintainers for
> this.

Hi,
Thanks, everybody for working on sorting this out.
I understand, hopefully, somebody can take a look at it.

BTW, happy to see IPQ60xx support made it in as IPQ807x
can use it for Gen3.

Regards,
Robert
>
> Bjorn

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-11 23:15    [W:0.428 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site