lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 4/5] powerpc/44x: Fix build failure with GCC 12 (unrecognized opcode: `wrteei')
Date
Oops, I wanted to include Pali and Segher when I sent the series, I 
prepared a script including them but used the wrong script at the end.

Le 11/07/2022 à 17:05, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 4:19 PM Christophe Leroy
> <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> wrote:
>> @@ -183,6 +183,18 @@ config 405_CPU
>> bool "40x family"
>> depends on 40x
>>
>> +config 440_CPU
>> + bool "440 (44x family)"
>> + depends on 44x
>> +
>> +config 464_CPU
>> + bool "464 (44x family)"
>> + depends on 44x
>> +
>> +config 476_CPU
>> + bool "476 (47x family)"
>> + depends on PPC_47x
>
> Is there any value in building for -mcpu=440 or -mcpu=464 when targeting a 476?

No idea, maybe not.

> Maybe add another !PPC_47x dependency for the first two. Ideally we would also
> enforce that 440/464 based boards cannot be selected together with 476, though
> I guess that is a separate issue.

Yes can do that.

By the way, 440/464 boards get excluded from kernel/cputable.c when 47x
is selected

>
> Is there a practical difference between 440 and 464 when building kernels?
> gcc seems to treat them the same way, so maybe one option for both is enough
> here.
>

I don't know.

Christophe
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-11 17:50    [W:0.232 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site